Should Western Governments And Leaders Be Immune From Regime Change?
Should Western Governments And Leaders Be Immune From Regime Change
?
SHOULD WESTERN GOVERNMENTSAND LEADERS BE IMMUNE FROM REGIME CHANGE?
By Stanley Collymore.
If Zionist, colonialist, western leaders like David Cameron, Sarkozy, Obama and Stephen Harper, for example, and others of their ilk can call for and even demand the selective and cold-blooded killings of those, that for whatever perverse, avaricious and corrupt reason they might entertain, they want to have murdered, what they euphemistically call regime change, even illegally targeting such people in purely domestic disputes in their own sovereign, independent countries to do this as is currently the case with Libya, should it not also be fair game for those, either at home or abroad, who equally detest these warmongers and with far more justification for doing so than they have in relation to their chosen quarries, to similarly in response to such immoral, diabolical and dastardly acts target and kill them, their close family members and rabid supporters as well? I know what I think. What do you? Or is one activity, the alleged promotion of democracy: that disingenuous and hoary chestnut that is always coughed up and used in such circumstances as a valid argument when the targeted victims are non-white and come from developing countries as they always are; while, in marked contrast, the other would be considered as acts of terrorism because the intended targets, apart from Obama who nevertheless is President of a Caucasian majority and white run state, are white?
And we know full well what the mindset of these so-called leaders when it appertains to the value or lack thereof of the lives of white and non-white people is, and natural justice, since for partisan and racist reasons the UN Security Council or the ICC will never act against these white rulers or their black surrogate, in the wake of the permanent absence of all legitimate means to redress and severely punish such persistent and aberrant behaviour demands at the very least an eye for an eye, if in doubt of that philosophy just ask those who run Zionist Israel, with the unequivocal message forcefully sent out to all renegade western leaders, or anyone else for that matter, masquerading as the upholders and defenders of democracy, ethical standards and universal human rights, which we know from past and ongoing experiences they most certainly are not, that you have two simple and non negotiable choices.
That you either change your current, much favoured and utterly reprehensible modus operandi that results in the repression, wanton killings, disempowerment, enslavement, abject, despairing hopes, marginalization, rapacious exploitation and utter contempt for the rule of law in relation to those whom you perceive as worthless and therefore expendable in you onward march for the control of their lives, natural resources and complete hegemony over their region of the world for your own selfish aims, personal gain and self-aggrandisement; that you stop this forthwith and instead show and exercise respect for the sanctity of life, including the lives of those you don't see eye to eye with, and although from years of bestial conduct you may be wholly incapable psychologically of creating a positive framework personally to facilitate marked improvements in the lives and futures of those you might still despite, that you all the same do nothing intentionally or by de facto means to interfere with or blight the chances of these people to meaningfully improve their lives. Other than that, and if you persist in your asinine ways, then you can expect no mercy and be left in no doubt that you will face the consequences of street justice; just as ruthlessly applied to the adverse wellbeing of yourselves and your nearest and dearest as in the same pitiless manner you had no hesitation whatsoever in meting out similar arbitrary treating to those you chose to.
And bluntly there shouldn't and will be no hiding place for unconscionable criminals like you, for that's what you are; for if sufficient numbers of people have the bottle to stand up and be counted like the students and other courageous young people in Egypt and Tunisia instead of as sadly many of them do at present passively fall in line and quite apathetically swallow the biased, deliberately manufactured and grossly misleading garbage grotesquely masquerading as fair news reporting by the usual culprits in the western media there won't be; since no phalanx of state security apparatus can guarantee a permanent 100 percent 24/7 inviolate no-fly zone of protection over your wretched lives or those closest to you.
Whether one works for the CIA, FBI, MI5, MI5 or whoever, each of them has their own Achilles Heel of family members, close friends and associates to worry about. These people like the one who unthinkingly carry out the bidding of their renegade western politicians and masters and are closely embedded with them don't exist and live in a bubble isolated from the remainder of us or all humanity. They have homes to go to; wives, partners, children, parents, other relatives and/or lovers that they associate with and have formed close bonds with; they like these other people go shopping, travel the highways and byways of their respective countries; take their children either to school or a myriad of other places; go on holiday; to churches, synagogues, mosques, temples and a plethora of other places, in fact like the rest of us they too go about their daily lives doing what all of us do as matter of course. But we don't go around ordering the assassinations of other people or stand idly by, say nothing and watch, possibly even doing so encouragingly as close relative do so. For if we did we would be complicit in murder; and if the wife let's say, other close relative or perhaps a confidant of a murderous Prime Minister for argument knows that this is exactly what her old man is doing and does nothing at all to prevent him even on moral ground then logic and the law dictate that she's equally complicit in that murder. And if the both of them know that the local courts or the ICC or some other European country or western one isn't going to assume and act of the Universal Law of Jurisdiction because of the colour of that person's skin or who he is, granting them a blank cheque of immunity so to speak, then draw your own conclusions what should be done.
So don't get bamboozled by the niceties of the law which work for some and ignore the rights of others and do so quite glaringly. Everyone has the right to life and if at all this should only be forfeited in the most extreme of case. But you can't simply go around because you think you're above the law and can do whatsoever you want, murder other people or publicly talk of taking them out as if you were a sack of rubbish you were disposing of in a dumpster and then expect your life and that of your family members to be inviolate; which leads on to another pertinent issue. Why should the sons and daughters of those who are obliged to live in the most depressed and economically blighted wastelands of the country, often intentionally made so, be compelled, principally through financial reasons to have a job and regular income coming in, to regard the armed forces as a career, not from choice and a burning desire to defend their country were it unreasonably attacked, but very much out of necessity? Then to find themselves sent abroad to fight illegitimate wars in countries they know absolutely nothing about and whose citizens they know even less of; and all for the sake of the further enrichment of a privileged few who make grotesque killings financially from their efforts and loss of life?
A situation that is further compounded by the fact that those who send them there to fight and die make absolutely sure that their own sons and daughters earmarked for cabinet positions in future governments of even rulers of the country won't be putting on their tin hats and volunteering to fight their dads phoney wars against terrorism. An already vile situation made even worse by the rightwing press and the well-heeled spivs that profit from these exploitative massacres and killings that they condescendingly refer to as collateral damage of those abroad whose countries they have invaded and occupied and are milking dry of their natural resources, that loudly beat the drums of war and cheer lead as they cowardly and intentionally stand on the sidelines passionately urging on these interventions and wars, and fighting them to the last drop of somebody else's blood.
Britain vigorously opposed any intervention by the UN in Northern Ireland's Civil war that the British couldn't even bring themselves to call it that ludicrously referring to it as the Troubles - should we also give that appellation to Libya's Troubles, bearing in mind that the Northern Irish civil war went on for decades and Libya's has only just started? stating most categorically that what was happening in Northern Ireland and on mainland Britain, let's not forget the bombings there one of which nearly wiped out the entire British cabinet including Maggie Thatcher, who says the Devil doesn't look after his own, at their party conference in Brighton, was strictly an internal affair. But how about this? It's Britain that carried out its fair share of state terrorism in Northern Ireland remember Bloody Sunday andBritain's active and surreptitious collaboration with Irish protestant paramilitary and other associated militias that Britain armed? that along with France, which didn't mind doing a spot of terrorism itself, par for the course with that country, when it blew up the Rainbow Warrior, what short memories these murderous political hooligans on both sides of the Channel have, was the principal instigator behind the cynical fig leaf of UN Resolution 1973, which Britain co-authored by the way, for its own intervention and that of other Islamophobic western countries that have a serious and obsessively paranoid issue with Islam in the internal affairs of anon-white, oil rich, African country. I wouldn't mind if these warmongers were consistent deplorable as their actions clearly are if just for once they did the same thing principally to an all-white or nearly so country. How about Chechnya; or if they really want to really demonstrate their alleged and much flaunted democratic credentials Tibet? Not white, of course, but you get the picture. But you know as well as I do they wouldn't dare; for China not only has nuclear weapons the United States is monstrously in hawk to China financially and the wars it is actually fighting at the preset are done so on money browed from China. You couldn't make it up could you?
So the western bully boys turn their hand as all bullies do to those they can attack and get away with it. But there are flashbacks too to the Berlin Conference in 1884 when every European country assembled in that capital to divide up Africa among themselves. No African was ever consulted of course, nor would the carvers up of their homelands have thought it necessary to do so; they simply didn't count and they don't now in 2011 to these western imperialists. Just take a cursory look at the map of Africa and look at the boundaries of the modern constituent countries there and you will quickly see how the slide rule was put to good effect for the colonialists but highly disastrous for the inhabitants of that continent these whites still see as the Dark Continent. Furthermore the genesis of most if not all of the problems of Africa stem from these interlopers that are trying to recreate another Berlin Conference, except that they're doing it with very high tech military hardware this time.
Colonialist and imperialist reason aside every objective person knows why Britain and the rest of these western parasites are in the Middle East and have set their Cruise and Tomahawk Missile sights on Libya. With Britain and particularly David Cameron and his Conservatives' lamentable track record on racism, non-white immigration to and widespread xenophobia in the UK, a racist political agenda and antipathy that is mirrored across Europe, it's downright risible if it weren't such a serious matter to even suggest let alone think that the likes of The Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Greece, Norway, Denmark with its racist attacks on Islam and the Prophet Mohammed, peace be upon him, in those conspicuously racist cartoons veiled concealed as free speech with their endemic racism , neo-fascist political parties in the ascendancy and about to assume power as the next governments of their respective countries, their quite recent and rather barbaric Nazi past against Jews then Die Untermenschen, now it's the turn of the Muslims to have that appellation hurled at them - along with Britain and France have voluntarily and quite willingly gone to Libya and are forking out over $US 200 dollars every day for the rather dubious privilege of providing humanitarian bonhomie to the Libyan people that these very leaders with a significant number of their own citizens perceive as and will refer to when they bother to think of them that is as a bunch of black and brown-skinned, Muslim, North African camel fucrs when they're not branding them like all Muslims as terrorists. I don't buy any of this tosh and no intelligent person with a conscience would either, I imagine.
Oil and regime change are in the forefront of the minds of these white, racist imperialist. Haven't any of you stopped and looked at the make up of these 21st century Crusaders; Snow White all of them except for the solitary cat's paw Qatar volunteering as one does in the armed forces to do something you've no choice but to, because it's really an order.
So let's get real. There will be consequences from this latest Crusader invasion of a Muslim country; and there will be a backlash. Think back to Munich and fast forward to London 2012. And when it happens I don't want to hear these dab hands at sponsoring death, mayhem, mass murders and genocide abroad through their state sponsored terrorism and the pathetic, ill-informed, flag-waving supporters and members of the public per se championing it and trying disingenuously to dupe others into believing that it's something else oh how wonderful of us that we're taking up yet again the black and brown man's burden; poor sod he can't manage it himself as he's not capable of doing so; never mind that the burden in question isn't his and wasn't created by him in the first place cry-baby moaners and wingers going on endlessly about terrorism on the streets of Britain when it happens, as it inevitably will.
The biggest recruiters for terrorism are western politicians and political leaders; it's their trade mark. They're also the world's biggest arms exporters to areas of conflict, as we saw recently with David Cameron taking an arms dealers' delegation to North Africa and the Middle East in the midst of popular uprisings against the dictators that his and other western countries installed and supported for decades; arms that are now massacring peaceful demonstrators in Bahrain and Yemen where the crack down, at the instigation of the same west that doesn't want to lose its favoured dictators there, is much more brutal than what is actually taking place in Libya, if you rule out the bombings and killings by Britain and the rest of the tantamount to we're going to rescue you if we have to kill you all in the process of doing so. But there is no no-fly zone or United Nations Security Council Resolution relative to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain or the Yemen. Nevertheless the entire free world knows that Saudi Arabia is one if not the most repressive dictatorships on Planet Earth. By the same token neither Morocco: another cesspit of brutality, gratuitous torture and yet another absolute monarch. How Dark Ages can you be in the 21st Century?
And it's the same west that then speaking through the other side of its mouth tells us that Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East; analogous to forcibly raping the daughters of everyone in your street while keeping your own under close wraps then parading her as the embodiment of the Virgin Mary and Mother Theresa rolled into one. The Middle East region is bereft of democracies and that goes for Africa too, because every time the local people try and even temporarily succeed in creating such grassroots democracies the west always snuff them out. Who overthrew Iran's democratically and very popular Prime Minister Dr Mohammad Mossadegh because he wasn't in favour of BP's predecessor exploiting his country's oil primarily for Britain's profit? Who overthrew Patrice Lumumba Congo's democratically elected President, brutally tortured and killed him because he wanted his country's massive wealth for the Congolese not Europeans, bearing in mind that European backwater Belgium developed into the comparatively wealthy country it is out of the Congo's wealth, country where at independence and after all the time Belgium was there less than point 5 percent of this vast country could read or write; split the Congo and placed another African tyrant Sese Seko Mobutu in charge of the greater and more profitable part? Who introduced the punitive acts of chopping of the hands of rubber sap collectors if they didn't meet their quota of sap collection from the rubber trees that produced natural rubber for the west?
Who overthrew Milton Obote the President of Uganda because he implacably opposed Margaret Thatcher and Britain's support for apartheid South Africa and wanted to have Britain suspended from the Commonwealth, which would have been an ignominious event for that country because it was Britain that formed the Commonwealth and considers it as its own, putting Idi Amin with the active help of MI6 in his place; Amin that later, they wanted to kid us, was a detestable dictator, as if they had nothing to do with what he was or became? Who continue to solidly back Israel to the hilt over its dreadful treatment of the Palestinians and the siege of Gaza? That pigheadedly refuses to recognize Hamas, the elected government of Palestine that emerged from free and fair elections monitored by the UN and a plethora of international observers and which ironically the west had called for but as it frequently does when democracy is the issue if the will of the people don't tally with their own selfish aims and world hegemony then those elected can't be democrats and must be banded as terrorists as is the case with Hamas. So the people of Gaza are being punished for doing what voters in the EU and the USA, let's rapidly skip over the elections of 2000 which we know George W. stole with the help of his brother, the then Governor of Florida and the USA's Supreme Court where a number of the judges there were either appointed by his father or pals of the family and do what buddies are suppose to do when one is in a tight spot.
So the west is in no position to lecture anyone about morality, democracy or anything else for that matter and the snippets of acts it has individually and collectively committed that can legitimately be called terrorist would run into several volumes. No wonder these countries are obsessed with terrorism in the same way that a crack cocaine addict is with drugs. For as long as these criminals in elected office feel and believe they can literally get away with murder they'll keep on doing it and with impunity, and that mustn't be allowed to continue anymore without consequences for these people and those who assist them. For partisan and racist reasons the UN Security Council and the ICC won't act against these people; that means that ordinary citizens not simply those in the countries that these murderers belong to but globally must make a stand against them. And in the absence of any official justice institute some good-old fashioned natural one. I can't think of a better and more effective deterrent that would seriously exercise the minds of these western tyrants and grant them time for reflective pause, so they'll think a thousand times and repeat that over and over again in their minds knowing what will happen to them should they carry on transgressing as they've been doing for yonks with impunity right up to the present.
Which poses the question: Should western governments be subject also to regime change and their renegade leaders to targeted assassinations, in and out of office, as they recommend and implement in the case of other world leaders they don't like?
Same Sex Marriages and Immigration The Government are practically to replace subsidies for fuel boilers. This is a large diversification that you need to take notice of Florida Death Records Available on the Net Shaw Capital Management March Newsletter: Japanese Government Submits Budget for Next Fiscal Year Government Records Council Nj-Government Records Retention Guidelines Qualify For Free Government Money Get Money You Never Have to Repay Tips And Suggested Structure To Come Up With A Workable Law Dissertation The Truth About Government Grant Kits There Is A Lot More to Law of Attraction Manifesting Than You Think How Labor Law Posters Helping Workers The Law of Sowing and Reaping Government Registry Review and Coupon Discount Is Federal Government Spending Failing America? Reviewing the National Debt