Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Artists » Virginia DMV Driving Under Influence Alcohol Driver License 18.2-266 18.2-271 18.2-271.1 County Impair Ability Drive
Shopping-and-Product-Reviews Music and Movies Artists Astrology Humanities Humor Language Philosophy Photography Poetry Tattoos Arts-and-Entertainment Singing poker video foreclosure television satellite toys horse belly culture interesting orchid collecting mastery fantastic fashion Casino-Gambling

Virginia DMV Driving Under Influence Alcohol Driver License 18.2-266 18.2-271 18.2-271.1 County Impair Ability Drive

Virginia DMV Driving Under Influence Alcohol Driver License 18.2-266 18.2-271 18.2-271.1 County Impair Ability Drive


DONALD E. WILLIAMS, COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, AND COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. ROGER EULIS HALE

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

1993 Va. App. LEXIS 447


September 21, 1993, Decided

This appeal by the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is from an order of the Circuit Court of Buchanan County (trial court) that set aside the revocation and suspension of Roger Eulis Hale's (appellee) "driver's license, registration certificate and license plates," and ordered that they be reinstated.

ISSUES:

Does substantial evidence in this record support the revocation order issued by the DMV?

Does the record establish that appellee was convicted of driving under the influence in Tennessee, and

Does Tennessee's statute prohibiting such conduct parallel and substantially conform to Code 18.2-266, the Virginia statute that prohibits driving under the influence.

Code 46.2-389, Virginia's revocation statute, provides, in pertinent part

that Commissioner shall forthwith revoke, and not thereafter reissue for one year, except as provided in 18.2-271 or 18.2-271.1, the driver's license, registration card, and license plates of any resident or nonresident on receiving a record of his conviction . . . of any of the following crimes, committed in violation of either a state law or a valid county, city, or town ordinance paralleling and substantially conforming to a like state law and to all changes and amendments of it: Thus, when the record establishes a valid out-of-state conviction, as it does in this case, we need only compare the elements of the two statutes. If the elements parallel and substantially conform, the requirements of Code 46.2-389 are satisfied, mandating an automatic license revocation by the DMV. The Tennessee statute prohibits "any person . . . to drive. . . any automobile . . . while under the influence of any intoxicant." Code 18.2-266 prohibits "any person to drive. . . any motor vehicle . . . (ii) while . . . under the influenceof alcohol, [or] (iii) . . . under the influence of any narcotic drug . . . to a degree which impairs his ability to drive or operate any motor vehicle . . . safely . . . ." Although the Tennessee statute does not contain the language, "impairs his ability to drive . . . safely," with respect to drug offenses, the Court found that proof under Tennessee's statute that a person is "under the influence of any intoxicant" is sufficiently comparable to proof under Code 18.2-266 that the person's ability to drive safely is impaired. Although the Tennessee statute does not contain the language, "impairs his ability to drive . . . safely," with respect to drug offenses, the court found that proof under Tennessee's statute that a person is "under theinfluence of any intoxicant" is sufficiently comparable to proof under Code 18.2-266 that the person's ability to drive safely is impaired. Another state's law regarding driving while under the influence of intoxicants or drugs need not substantially conform in every respect to Code 18.2-266." both statutes contain the "substantially conforming" requirement with respect to the use of convictions from other states.


DECISION:

The judgment of the trial court was reversed and the order of the DMV reinstated.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm's unofficial views of the Justices' opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
The Artistic Part Of Seo In receipt of Service From A Freelance Web Artist DUI Salem Virginia Reckless Driving 18.2-266 Appeal Roanoke Montgomery County Esjehi Art Gallery A Representation Of Artistic Maldives Michel Arnault Artiste Peintre Et Land Art NOVOS ARTISTAS EXPONDO NA EUROPA West Virginia Colleges Precisely Why It's Simple To Find A Dentist Around Ashburn, Virginia i2V Graphics : Graphic Artist, Image Editing Services, Image Clipping Path, Background Removal Services & Image to vector conversion Know How Hotels In Charleston West Virginia Attracts A Large Number Of Hosting Investors Esjehi Art Gallery A Representation Of Artistic Maldives Fairfax County Reckless Driving Ticket Virginia Defense Lawyers Laws Cleo Announces Their Make Me A Makeup Artist Winner
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(216.73.216.142) California / Anaheim Processed in 0.017911 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 30 , 3770, 117,
Virginia DMV Driving Under Influence Alcohol Driver License 18.2-266 18.2-271 18.2-271.1 County Impair Ability Drive Anaheim