Welcome to YLOAN.COM
yloan.com » Politics and Government » What differentiates Stark Law and Anti-kickback statute
Legal Politics and Government Identity-Theft Living-Will application grants plans factors obama career recommendations defense thanksgiving solutions supplies augmentation popularity employee hiring human criminal exclusive workouts suggestions evaluation schedule suppliers gorgeous recruitment fake registration industries manufacturer employees resources

What differentiates Stark Law and Anti-kickback statute

Often Stark law (physician referral prohibition statute) is mistaken for the federal anti-kickback statute

. The difference between the two baffles all. While both laws cover similar ground, an arrangement that's acceptable under one of these statutes could violate the other. The fact of the matter is that they are different in laws, and different in scope. The Stark statute pertains only to physician referrals under Medicare and Medicaid while the anti-kickback statute is much broader and impacts anyone engaging in business with a federal health care program. The Stark statute doesn't require bad intent; a tainted financial relationship violates the Stark law irrespective of good intentions. In comparison, the anti-kickback statute requires specific intent and violations may end in criminal actions. The anti-kickback statute is a criminal statute. Originally enacted almost 30 years ago, the statute bars any knowing or willful solicitation or acceptance of any kind of compensation to induce referrals for health services that are reimbursable by the Federal government. For instance, a provider may not routinely waive a patient's co-payment or deductible. The government would see this as an inducement for the patient to select the provider for reasons other than medical benefit. Whereas these prohibitions were originally limited to services reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid programs, new legislation increased the statute's reach to any Federal healthcare program. In comparison, the Stark law is a civil statute. Enacted initially in 1989, with amendments enacted in 1993 and 1994, the Stark law essentially provides that a doctor may not refer a patient to an entity with which the doctor has an ownership interest or compensation arrangement if payments for the services furnished under the referrals are to be made by the Medicare or Medicaid programs. Contrary to the anti-kickback statute, the Stark Law prohibits referrals for specific designated health services. For more on the Stark law and anti-kickback statute, sign up for an audio conference

.

What differentiates Stark Law and Anti-kickback statute

By: Angela Martin
Achieving Your Weight Loss Goals with the Law of Attraction RIM's Agreement With India Is Likely to Foreshadow Wider Government Access Administrative law in France Los Angeles Dui Lawyer: Getting The Law To Support You Renting A Property - The Law And You Tips For Finding The Best Id Card Systems For Your Company Wisconsin Medicaid Cost Reduction - A Little Bit Of Good News On Government Spending Manifesting Miracles - Using The Law of Attraction to Change YOUR Life The Dichotomy of Religious and Secular Law in Ancient Greece Government Takeover Will Continue The Political Polarity That Was Athens and Sparta Know More About Law Posters Persuasion Or Office Politics?
print
www.yloan.com guest:  register | login | search IP(216.73.216.166) California / Anaheim Processed in 0.017191 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip enabled , discuz 5.5 through PHP 8.3.9 , debug code: 6 , 2500, 72,
What differentiates Stark Law and Anti-kickback statute Anaheim