Appliances "comparative Test" When Complete "curtain"?
2007 1 11, China Quality Association, the National Users Committee
, quality magazine published by the tripartite joint organization of the refrigerator, washing machine checks the performance of "comparative test" results. Subsequently, the media quoted the results of the report made the following content: "three refrigerator power consumption and marked discrepancies", "two noise machine washing relatively large noise and dehydration."?? Similar message directly affect the part of the appliance enterprise market. A ripple, the household electrical appliance enterprises have reacted strongly, have asked China to clarify the matter Quality Association.
The results are somewhat
credibility?
"Comparison test" of the organizers in the information provided to the media, said: "comparative test" the prototype extraction method is "buy at the mall as consumer sampling." The test results, said: "products in the refrigerator, the cooling capacity and noise control in general good; but Hisense refrigerator (Model BCD-186U6) in the effective volume and the energy efficiency indices slightly inferior. Hisense refrigerator (Model BCD-186U6) The new flight refrigerator (Model BCD-179CK) and Meiling refrigerator (Model BCD-199ZM2) the existence of nominal power consumption value than the actual test results of the phenomenon, Meiling refrigerator (Model BCD-199ZM2) energy efficiency index inconsistent with the nominal value. "" products in the washing machine, energy saving, water saving performance are better, because washing the design in different ways, different brands of cleaning and noise control than there were certain differences. Among them, the Samsung washing machine (Model To XQB60-M71) and Panasonic washing machine (model XQB60-Q600U) washing the relatively large noise, noise and dehydration. "
News conference, the reporter consulted on this matter experts in the relevant standards, the experts pointed out that such a release product performance, and to make qualitative assessments, would mislead consumers, its credibility is worth doubt.
"The publication of any product performance standard and test data are based. The refrigerator according to national standards and energy efficiency standards for refrigerators, energy-efficient products and test value of the nominal value of the energy efficiency of its provisions within the permitted level errors, power consumption and the nominal value of the gap as long as the range of allowable error, the product is qualified. "The expert further stressed that as the external test environment, test conditions and test equipment are likely to lead to test different values and nominal value of the error, so long as they are in the same energy efficiency level, the product does not match the nominal power consumption is perfectly normal, it is difficult to find third-party testing and product value of the nominal value of fully consistent with refrigerators.
Although the organizers claimed the
"comparative test" results from the national quality supervision and testing center come home appliances, but the organizational side of the news release, there is no specific data were released, but to indicate the performance of star way in the society. Organizers provided to the media in the two form impressively marked various branded products target various performance star.
"This performance is the basis of published where? Whether the requirements of the standard test? In the absence of supervision, there is no specific test data publicized case, the third party themselves into a star indicators you trust?" Hisense related are filled with righteous indignation that.
Reporter investigated by sampling the refrigerator basically a state of energy efficiency products are 180L ~ 200L volume between the basic price of the same grade, are about 2,000 yuan (see Table 1). In accordance with national standards, the performance of these products should be little difference. Therefore, it is business question: "products are in line with national standards, the standard error of the provisions is limited, so product performance should be similar. We have not seen in the case of detection of specific data, how can the product's release a big performance gap? a star and five-star of that? This is irresponsible. more questionable motives behind the experiment. "
Checks? Comparison test?
Comparison test results in the fourth day of the China Household Electrical Appliances Association released the results of comparative tests of the main square qualification testing process and test results of the Department are questioned.
Appliances "comparative Test" When Complete "curtain"?
By: hotxueboy
Vietnam's Apparel Exports In Good Condition Look Different With Piercing Five Star Rush Zhejiang Yongle Personal Experience Of Fighting World Map Ones Few Important Facts About Cabinet Panel Coolers Just For You Get Rid Of Melasma The Importance Of Belly Dance Hip Scarves Vision Shopsters: 2010 Worldwide Rv Parks & Campgrounds Industry Report ATLETISMO NA ESCOLA: Porque não? Finding An Apartment In Hague How Can Students Of Cbse Class X Improve Their Reading Skills? This is the Quran that Pastor Terry Jones wants to burn (1) Los Tres Elementos Indispensables Para El Éxito Simple Ways To Have Cheap International Calls