Protestors Evicted From Democracy Village

When visiting London, Tourists can view such historic sites as Trafalgar Square

, the Tower of London or Buckingham Palace. But one site that will no longer be available to visit is Democracy Village. But is it a defining feature of London, or a nuisance?

The High Court ruled, not long ago, that the protestors that had taken camp on Parliament Square, were to be evicted. Protestors however did not agree and instructed their solicitors to appeal this decision. The Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court judgement, and so protestors will have to dismantle their tents and leave.

While the demonstrators could still appeal this latest decision further, London solicitors that represent the group have been informed not to pursue the matter.

The green which resides in central London, in front of the Houses of Parliament, is common ground for demonstrations. But the current group of protestors have inhabited the land for so long that it bars other groups from demonstrating, according to the courts.

Critics have further argued that the square has been vandalised as a result of this tented village and there are public health concerns due to the lack of toilet facilities.

Lord Neuberger remarked in his judgement that even though the title of the land belonged to the crown, the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, did have the power to act over the square.

Lord Neuberger went on to say that the protestors have been allowed to express their views and assemble together at the location of their choice for over two months on an effectively exclusive basis. It is not even as if they will necessarily be excluded from mounting an orthodox demonstration at Parliament Square Gardens in the future."

The Mayor of London responded jubilantly at the news, remarking that it's wonderful that as a city we can protest. But it is nauseating what they are doing to the lawn."It's become too much. It's doing serious damage to a world heritage site."

Jan Luba QC along with his solicitors in London had argued that Mr Johnson had no right to evict the demonstrators as he did not have title to the land. This title belonged to the Queen.

But this case has raised some serious questions about the Governments commitment to the democratic process. Is it really good enough to inform someone that they cant protest because it would mess up your lawn? Or is the protection of heritage sites superior to the protection of the public voice?

If you require legal advice on this or any issue, feel free to call us and request a solicitor in your area, be it solicitors London, solicitors Hull or solicitors Liverpool.

by: Antonia Torr

POST COMMENT

How to Get Started With Yoga Torrance Assisted Living How To Tell When Your Tires Are Biting The Dust Rancho Cucamonga Assisted Living Paperless Direct Debits Orange Assisted Living Oceanside Assisted Living Nice MX-1000 Iron Are Any Of The Following Decreasing The Length Of Your Life? Badge Holders For Every Purpose How To Curb Your Craving For Sugar Limitations of Wooden Or Metal Fences The Best Stretches For Office Workers