Leadership: Testing Your Gut Instincts

What do these four statements have in common: I always exclude my own interests from business decisions; I exercise a strong sense of objectivity; I've learnt to proceed slowly and not rush decisions; unsurprisingly

, the record shows I make good ones? The first link is lack of self-awareness - assuming I believe them. More importantly, as the authors of a recent article argue, there's need for psychological checks to keep us honest - and out of trouble. Here's how.

Let's start with a bit of background. The authors of the above article stress (and it's intuitively easy to accept) that each of our past experiences has an emotional tag on it. The horse that kicked you would have left a negative tag. Your first boss's generosity a positive one. And, the mixed behaviour of the first team you led may have created a tag reminding you about humans and their differences. So today when you meet a new horse or boss, or lead a new team, the old imprints play a part in your reactions and decisions about whether to go riding, agree to work with that boss or how you lead the new team.

Let's now look at the authors' four tests. Ask yourself how your colleagues would rate you on each?

Independence: when the business has to relocate, do you keep your commute and other personal priorities out of the equation? If you personally have a lot at stake, do you table your conflict?

Measured emotions: tags are not all of the same intensity. If your first experience with Government employees was upsetting and unsuccessful, will that inhibit you in negotiating a Government contract for your company? Can you neutralise that emotional loading?

True familiarity: is your current situation really similar to previous ones? Just because it's a crisis, doesn't mean it's the same as previous ones you handled well. The lessons from what you did and their emotional success-tagging may be quite misleading. Would team members say you detect the differences between current and past situations - and adjust your decisions and actions?

Feedback: did you get honest feedback on those earlier situations - thus ensuring each received its right tag? Perhaps it wasn't as successful as your thought. Did anyone have the courage to tell you you'd stuffed up? And, did you believe them - or rationalise a different memory?

Think of when you were last appointed to a new role: how well did you evaluate the new challenges and the relevance (or irrelevance!) of your experience? Today, with so much technological and market disruption, how have these depreciated your experiences and the relevance of their associated tags?

In addition, with the team you lead today: have you worked out how they differ from other teams (in age profile, skill attributes or personal requirements) and recognised the need for different leadership actions? To this end, you should create a personal Leadership Action Plan - ignoring old assumptions and approaches and their now-irrelevant emotional messages. Otherwise, you're heading for a failure - with a new and nasty emotional tag attached.

by: Tim Pascoe

POST COMMENT

Leadership: That One Key Lesson Leadership: What Are Your Voices Doing To You? Leadership: When You're Newly Appointed Few Important Possible Ways Of Defining Leadership Out Of Many The Abc's Of Leadership What Is Effective Leadership? The "Why" Of Leadership Leadership Development: How Managers Should Ask For Feedback Becoming A Leader With Leadership Quotes Leadership Success Depends On Momentum Leadership Importance Of Emotional Intelligence (eq) Leadership: Five Faults To Fix Leadership in Social Work Practice and Later Life Care